The Rancor Pit Forum Index
Welcome to The Rancor Pit forums!

The Rancor Pit Forum Index
FAQ   ::   Search   ::   Memberlist   ::   Usergroups   ::   Register   ::   Profile   ::   Log in to check your private messages   ::   Log in

Why is "old" obsolete?
Post new topic   Reply to topic    The Rancor Pit Forum Index -> Ships, Vehicles, Equipment, and Tech -> Why is "old" obsolete? Goto page Previous  1, 2
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
DougRed4
Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral


Joined: 18 Jan 2013
Posts: 2259
Location: Seattle, WA

PostPosted: Wed Mar 29, 2023 1:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yes, welcome, jtanzer!
_________________
Currently Running: Villains & Vigilantes (a 32-year-old campaign with multiple groups) and D6 Star Wars; mostly on hiatus are Adventures in Middle-earth and Delta Green
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Mamatried
Commodore
Commodore


Joined: 16 Dec 2017
Posts: 1829
Location: Norway

PostPosted: Wed Mar 29, 2023 3:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

A bolt action rifle will always be obsolete when compared to a automatic rife
of course sniper and specialized rifes are still current, but they serve spesific roles, they are not assault or battle rifles.

Weapon Development comes in stages, and within each stage the actual differences are more or less insignificant.

lets go to WW 1 Every nation had bolt action rifles, though repeater like lever actions and others had been around for decades, however the standard military rifle was the bolt action.

The difference between the rifles is insignificant. and the Bolt action stayed the norm for decades until another stage was met, in 1937 the M1 Garand
a semi action rifle that now gave the soldier superior firepower compared to everyone else.
With the US entry into the Europen thater with the M1 we began to see this
stage begin to take over and replace the former stage.
The germans now developed the GSW and other sutomatic rifles, so did the
russians and the other allies.
By the next decade there was only automatic rifles, again the actual difference between them was and is not significant.

We are now still in the automatic rifle stage, and while technology have moved forward, the actual differneces betwwne autmatic rifle A and B is still not significant.

We can debate material and alloys and weight, but this can be said regardless of technology stage. We can make a flint lock muzzle loarder from light weight alloys but it is still obsolete.

We can take a early model automatic and use it more or less as any other auomatic, making them not obsolete.

Age really is a red herring, and we have so many examples of this, machinguns, tanks, ariplanes many waepon systems lasting decades, even some few having lasted a century, all becuse they are still on the same stage, and will only be obsolete on next stage regardless of age.

We still have modern militaries with Browning HP or even Tokarevs and M1911s still in use, and the FN FAL or the HK G3 still in use even with nato countries, becuse while some guns are better than others and lighter and that they are all on the same stage of technology, Automatics, and the actual differenc is more on the skill of the shooter then the properties of the gun.

In star wars terms to me this means basically that the difference between balsters are at best neglible when we look +/- 100 or so years since the stage of techolofy is Blaster and have not moved past that.

However it logical and natural that you will have issues with keeping the same gun alive for 3000 years, but making a 3000 yr old blaster design with new materials is actually not having an obsolete gun, it fully upto date, it is a balster.......

Bringing me back to the sword being a sword, and a 2000 yr odl sword, is equals to a 10 yr old one, however you will not be able to keep a sword for 2000 years.......
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jtanzer
Lieutenant
Lieutenant


Joined: 01 Mar 2023
Posts: 75

PostPosted: Sat Apr 01, 2023 11:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

So then, why don't modern armies use flintlock muskets? If the materials and machining are better, then why aren't more militaries using flintlocks?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Mamatried
Commodore
Commodore


Joined: 16 Dec 2017
Posts: 1829
Location: Norway

PostPosted: Sun Apr 02, 2023 10:02 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

jtanzer wrote:
So then, why don't modern armies use flintlock muskets? If the materials and machining are better, then why aren't more militaries using flintlocks?



Threshold beyond this.
We can still make the rifles though, they work just as they did, the rifle does not loose any attributes, we have better weapons, more effective loading and that, but the muscet made in 2010 and the muscet made in 1790 are both muscets and the difference between the two muscets is non significant.


Automatic rifle is where now are at the technological threshold, and the 1950 M16 is still and M16, modenrnized and having some factors inmproved, not ammo making the vietnam era M16 and the gulf war era M16 more or less identical.

As I said all military technologuy goes in stagess, we have autoloaders this is why we do not use flitlocks, but a Flitlock of 1790 is just as deadly as a flintlick of 2020, meaning that regardelss of AGE alone, the weapon is obsolete only when repaced by something that fills the role and have a higher tech level, never age alone,

Again I would argeu that a Longbow cut from a treebrach today is no less deadlt than a longbow cut from a treebarcha in 1348 they are IDENTICAL.

But a bow is alwasyre obsolete compared to a rifle

Stages,


Wheel locks, flit locks, percussion cap, not that ALL of these come befre Mutlple shots aand ease of loading.

T\We will always heve prototypes and the like, and many weapons will be of higher tec level thant he military.
lets look to the civil war, 1860s, they had both revolavers with case ammo, not as common as ball and powder though.
They had Lever action rifles holding upto 15 rounds, shooting on average faster than most WW2 rifles 8+ yrs later.

What did they use and what was their technology, Muzzle Loaders, and only inot the war, muzzle loader with percussion cap, and not flintlock.

So they had lever action rifles, but sued mussleloaders


So I still argue that AGE does not determine if a gun is obsolete, but if the gun used can be repalced on average by a significantly better gun that represent a significant leap in technology.

Blaster having a more effective gas disperal system allowing a +1Pip to damage is NOT new thecnology, but a Blaster that had becime HOMG is, the HOMG weapons, have many of the arributes of the Blaster, but they are invisible ( we have this on nightstinger sniper rigle it is claimed) and they can not be heard, and all HOMG guns are by default shooting this invisbly energy dispeperson.......Now it is nre tech level , now blaster is obsolete.


Bow-BOW = not obsoltee evern with internal differences in category
Bow-Wheel Locks = Bow Obsoloete

Wheel Locak- Wheel Locks = obsoltee evern with internal differences in category

Wheel-Flint = Wheel lock obsolete

Fleint -FLint = Equal

FLint-Bolt Action = FLint Obsoloete

Bolt -Bolt = Equal
Bolt -Auto = Bolt obsolete

Auto -Auto = equal and this is where we are in out eartly world, this is the highest leels of firearms technology, AUTOLOADER

In Star wars we have blasters, we do not have anything that have repalced the balster, so in star wars it is

Blaster Tech - Blaster tech is Equal, even with the interanl and differences from gun to gun, it istill the same tech level. jo level has repaced this yet.


So becusr there is no tech ABOV E blaster tech as to guns, yhen NO BLASTER TECH gun is obsolte

Age is not a factor, techologial threhold is
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jtanzer
Lieutenant
Lieutenant


Joined: 01 Mar 2023
Posts: 75

PostPosted: Thu Apr 06, 2023 3:49 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I feel that this conversation has devolved, or soon will devolve, past the point of usefulness. It's clear that we have different views on this topic. The only right answer is how you want to run your game.

Personally, I feel that the minute advances in technology that pileup over time are sufficient to justify de-rating weapons and equipment from previous eras. It might not matter that much long-term, however it does mean that if a player wants to use an older piece of equipment, they have to spend credits upgrading it to make it viable. It also may not be forwards-compatible with most modern tech, and efforts to make it compatible, or work around it's incompatibility, are going to be even more expensive and time consuming. The players then face the choice of hacking things together Ukraine-style, or "acquiring" more modern equipment that's more capable.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    The Rancor Pit Forum Index -> Ships, Vehicles, Equipment, and Tech All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2
Page 2 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group


v2.0