MrNexx Rear Admiral
Joined: 25 Mar 2016 Posts: 2248 Location: San Antonio
|
Posted: Wed Feb 08, 2017 10:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
I agree, your game, your rules, but how is it not valid to say "Movement costs an action because it requires some of your attention, as evidenced by how much easier it is to do things when not moving?" _________________ "I've Seen Your Daily Routine. You Are Not Busy!"
“We're going to win this war, not by fighting what we hate, but saving what we love.”
http://rpgcrank.blogspot.com/ |
|
Xain Arke Line Captain
Joined: 19 Sep 2010 Posts: 989
|
Posted: Wed Feb 08, 2017 11:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | I agree, your game, your rules, but how is it not valid to say "Movement costs an action because it requires some of your attention, as evidenced by how much easier it is to do things when not moving?" |
Oh, it is completely valid MrNexx as the RAW in the WEG Star Wars D6 books make faster than cautious movement cost an action in combat. I wouldn't argue that at all in general.
But could it not be argued that ANY movement should cost an action on the same evidence you presented?
Not that I would argue that, mind you.
The discussion started with a question about making the Base move of a creature, vehicle or starship the actual default move in a specific person's campaign. I do this (only for characters though) and it works fine for me, you have a different opinion that you put forward, which is great.
Everyone having the same opinion, is nobody having any opinion.
Quote: | Well, stop slapping yourself then! Laughing |
Oh, I try garhkal, I really do try (in your face Yoda)
Xain |
|