The Rancor Pit Forum Index
Welcome to The Rancor Pit forums!

The Rancor Pit Forum Index
FAQ   ::   Search   ::   Memberlist   ::   Usergroups   ::   Register   ::   Profile   ::   Log in to check your private messages   ::   Log in

Placing a Larger scale shield generator in a ship?
Post new topic   Reply to topic    The Rancor Pit Forum Index -> Ships, Vehicles, Equipment, and Tech -> Placing a Larger scale shield generator in a ship?
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
tetsuoh
Captain
Captain


Joined: 21 Jul 2010
Posts: 505

PostPosted: Mon Jan 21, 2013 4:04 am    Post subject: Placing a Larger scale shield generator in a ship? Reply with quote

I have a plan to install a larger scale shield generator on my ship - but is this even possible?

The only rules for any of this I have seen have been replacing shield generators with better ones in GG10: Tramp Freighters.

Also - if this isnt in any of the books - what are your thoughts on this?

Alotment on my ship isnt the real concern - as I have 165 metric tons of space that is currently unused.

I can see needing a larger power supply to help run it of course.
I can also see only being able to use one that is one scale larger due to scale itself - attempting to put one that is two scales larger would be impossible in my eyes as at that point the shield generator is likely larger than the ship itself.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
CRMcNeill
Director of Engineering
Director of Engineering


Joined: 05 Apr 2010
Posts: 16178
Location: Redding System, California Sector, on the I-5 Hyperspace Route.

PostPosted: Mon Jan 21, 2013 10:22 am    Post subject: Re: Placing a Larger scale shield generator in a ship? Reply with quote

tetsuoh wrote:
I have a plan to install a larger scale shield generator on my ship - but is this even possible?

The only rules for any of this I have seen have been replacing shield generators with better ones in GG10: Tramp Freighters.


The only book that deals with starfighter-scale ships gaining any sort of Capital Ship status is the Imperial Sourcebook, where the Skipray Blastboat and the Gamma Assault Shuttle are considered Capital Scale due to power output. No conversion rules are provided.


Quote:
Also - if this isnt in any of the books - what are your thoughts on this?

Alotment on my ship isnt the real concern - as I have 165 metric tons of space that is currently unused.

I can see needing a larger power supply to help run it of course.
I can also see only being able to use one that is one scale larger due to scale itself - attempting to put one that is two scales larger would be impossible in my eyes as at that point the shield generator is likely larger than the ship itself.


Well, as I noted above, it is certainly possible to put a massive power supply with accompanying shields into a smaller ship, but if it were easy or inexpensive, then everyone would be doing it. Don't forget that the 6D difference in Scale between Starfighter and Capital isn't supposed to be an arithmetic progression; 1D Capital Ship Shields are a lot more than 6 times more powerful when compared to 1D Starfighter Shields

For a jerry-rigged install like this, I would most definitely not let it be mishap free. There should be random complications that come into play with a do-it-yourself install of equipment this powerful. Maybe on a Wild Dice failure, some or all of the ship's systems short out, requiring a quick Repair roll.

In addition, you are going to use up a LOT of space just for the shield generator, never mind the larger power generator. The only current guidelines are in the Starships of the Galaxy Conversion book, where when converting starfighter-scale equipment to capital-scale, it calls for multiplying the weight and price by 20. That means even a 1D shield generator is going to weigh 120 metric tons or more, and cost around 80,000 credits (based on the Tramp Freighter 1D shield's weight of 6 metric tons @ 4,000 credits), leaving your freighter with only 45 metric tons of cargo capacity.

Above and beyond the technical concerns, there are legal ones, as well. A system like this will be impossible to conceal from customs inspectors and other official types, and they will have some serious questions as to why you need something so massive.

IMO, I really can't see what advantages you will gain from this that will be worth the complications that will result. You'd be better off just upgrading your existing shields by several D, which will reduce the expenses, the added weight, the technical headaches, and the legal headaches as well.
_________________
"No set of rules can cover every situation. It's expected that you will make up new rules to suit the needs of your game." - The Star Wars Roleplaying Game, 2R&E, pg. 69, WEG, 1996.

The CRMcNeill Stat/Rule Index
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
vanir
Jedi


Joined: 11 May 2011
Posts: 793

PostPosted: Mon Jan 21, 2013 2:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Generally I prefer to convert using half/double measure between scales and reserve scale variations on single craft for special purposes, like the point defence lasers on a capital scale ship being starfighter scale (for reaction speed).

So when I mount an E-Web on a PC's speeder, I change it to speeder scale because it's going to be fired from the cabin, and half the damage to 4D speeder scale. If it was pintle mounted, manhandled by a gun crew and designed to be anti-personnel I might keep it character scale to make aiming at intended targets easier.

Same when I converted the Skipray for 12j stats, in which the craft is rewritten as starfighter scale and only the ion cannon are capital scale. It detects as capital scale, but more correctly flies and handles as starfighter scale. Only the main ion guns are unwieldy to aim, the small twin laser turret is fast, modern and high powered, perfect for taking down starfighters. Hull and shields are starfighter scale (which is important when you use 2e cap scaling like I do), it's the amount of power the main ion guns draw that bumps up the output reading.

And for that conversion it was simple, just double capital scale codes to get the appropriate starfighter scale ones. Don't use the 2R&E scale conversion dice for this kind of adjustment, this is more like shipbuilding and modification, not scale conversions between two class of craft in combat with each other.

Another way to put it is a Skipray is already about a 4D starfighter class structure, it's just written as about 2D capital scale to keep commonality because the author wanted capital scale main guns.
It really works better for game mechanics and more detailed Imperials to impose the complication of varied scale and rewrite the Skipray as starfighter scale. It's tougher.

I do the same thing with any scale conversion. If Players want to put a small turbolaser on a tramp freighter I'll initially convert it from 3D+2 capital scale to 7D starfighter scale unless they specify they want a capital scale installation, which I then throw some terms like power grid around and make them jump through some hoops.


Unless you specifically intended to have capital scaling on your shields, the correct conversion should be double capital dice to get starfighter dice equivalent, in shipbuilding terms. Different for combat scaling.
So your 3D capital scale shields would be 6D starfighter scale shields after installation on a starfighter-scale transport. But consider the size of capital ships that normally have 3D shields, pretty gigantic compared to a starfighter.
So I would also argue 3D capital scale shields is entirely unrealistic on a starfighter, how would you power them, tow a cruiser-sized power core behind the ship?
The tramp freighters guide mentions three classes of readily available shield ratings (starfighter scale), 1D 2D 3D and that modifying shields is much more difficult than other items so GMs might impose a 2pip restriction on modifying factory shields, otherwise larger shield generators must be purchased and installed (ie. mod 1D to 1D+2 but have to buy 2D shields if you want more power). This maxes out starfighter shields on modified tramp freighters to 3D+2 which is powerful.

If this represents a limit of current typical production technologies then that would be to say a starfighter class transport can provide power for up to about 3D+2 shields or 1D+2, 2D on the outside in capital scale.


So if you specifically wanted capital scale shields on your starfighter vessel, then I'd impose about a 2D restriction for power, ship class and size reasons, but I'd say you're better off just converting it to starfighter scale and using it as an explanation of where you got 4D starfighter shields from: adapted them from 2D capital ship shields you stole off a cruiser.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
CRMcNeill
Director of Engineering
Director of Engineering


Joined: 05 Apr 2010
Posts: 16178
Location: Redding System, California Sector, on the I-5 Hyperspace Route.

PostPosted: Mon Jan 21, 2013 3:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

vanir wrote:
Generally I prefer to convert using half/double measure between scales and reserve scale variations on single craft for special purposes, like the point defence lasers on a capital scale ship being starfighter scale (for reaction speed).


It shouldn't be an issue to have smaller scale weaponry on a larger scale ship; the ship will have power and cargo capacity to spare to run such things, especially with regard to things like dock guns on light freighters or point defense weaponry on capital ship. It's when you try to reverse it that it becomes an issue.


Quote:
So when I mount an E-Web on a PC's speeder, I change it to speeder scale because it's going to be fired from the cabin, and half the damage to 4D speeder scale. If it was pintle mounted, manhandled by a gun crew and designed to be anti-personnel I might keep it character scale to make aiming at intended targets easier.


But that actually makes the E-Web less effective. It's only a 2D scale step between Character and Speeder, so by cutting the damage in half, you are reducing the E-Web's damage from 8D to 6D for no apparent reason. A better conversion would be to subtract the scale difference from the damage, but add it to FC, so a vehicle mounted E-Web would have 6D Damage with 2D Fire Control.


Quote:
Same when I converted the Skipray for 12j stats, in which the craft is rewritten as starfighter scale and only the ion cannon are capital scale. It detects as capital scale, but more correctly flies and handles as starfighter scale. Only the main ion guns are unwieldy to aim, the small twin laser turret is fast, modern and high powered, perfect for taking down starfighters. Hull and shields are starfighter scale (which is important when you use 2e cap scaling like I do), it's the amount of power the main ion guns draw that bumps up the output reading.


I made the Concussion Missile Launcher Capital-Scale, as well. This gives the Skipray the punch to take on capital ships with something other than the ion cannon.


Quote:
And for that conversion it was simple, just double capital scale codes to get the appropriate starfighter scale ones. Don't use the 2R&E scale conversion dice for this kind of adjustment, this is more like shipbuilding and modification, not scale conversions between two class of craft in combat with each other.

Another way to put it is a Skipray is already about a 4D starfighter class structure, it's just written as about 2D capital scale to keep commonality because the author wanted capital scale main guns.


That seems rather arbitrary. After all, the Skipray has been Capital-Scale since 1E, regardless of changes in the scale system. Reducing the conversion actually weakens the Skipray; based on the 2R&E Scale System, it should have a Hull of 8D+1 with 8D Shields. I don't see how a 4D starfighter-scale vessel can be compared to a 2D capital-scale one and called equal.

I get around this by using 4D scale steps, with Capital split into multiple categories depending on size. Large ships like Star Destroyers and Mon Cal cruisers are +8D over starfighters, while smaller vessels such as frigates and corvettes are in an intermediate class called Escort, which is only a +4D step over starfighters. Using this system makes the Skipray a bit more modest, as it's Hull and Shields are now a more modest 6D+1/6D @ Starfighter-Scale. Since I also apply scale modifiers to Maneuverability, it balances out even further by making the Skipray fast and well armed and armored, but with the maneuverability of a dead bantha.


Quote:
Unless you specifically intended to have capital scaling on your shields, the correct conversion should be double capital dice to get starfighter dice equivalent, in shipbuilding terms. Different for combat scaling.
So your 3D capital scale shields would be 6D starfighter scale shields after installation on a starfighter-scale transport. But consider the size of capital ships that normally have 3D shields, pretty gigantic compared to a starfighter.


Again, not sure where you are getting this from in the RAW. 3D Capital scale shields should be 9D starfighter scale, since under the RAW, Cap ships are +6D over starfighters on the scale chart.


Quote:
The tramp freighters guide mentions three classes of readily available shield ratings (starfighter scale), 1D 2D 3D and that modifying shields is much more difficult than other items so GMs might impose a 2pip restriction on modifying factory shields, otherwise larger shield generators must be purchased and installed (ie. mod 1D to 1D+2 but have to buy 2D shields if you want more power). This maxes out starfighter shields on modified tramp freighters to 3D+2 which is powerful.


However, it is still possible to go higher. In addition to the powerful shields on a Skipray Blastboat, the Gamma Assault Shuttle is also rated as Capital-Scale, with Starfighter-Scale Hull and Shields equivalents of 9D+2 and 10D+2. At 30 meters in length, the Gamma is in the same general size category as a light freighter or shuttle, so it's not the technology that's limited; it's how much you want to pay for it.
_________________
"No set of rules can cover every situation. It's expected that you will make up new rules to suit the needs of your game." - The Star Wars Roleplaying Game, 2R&E, pg. 69, WEG, 1996.

The CRMcNeill Stat/Rule Index
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
garhkal
Sovereign Protector
Sovereign Protector


Joined: 17 Jul 2005
Posts: 14034
Location: Reynoldsburg, Columbus, Ohio.

PostPosted: Mon Jan 21, 2013 5:37 pm    Post subject: Re: Placing a Larger scale shield generator in a ship? Reply with quote

crmcneill wrote:

Above and beyond the technical concerns, there are legal ones, as well. A system like this will be impossible to conceal from customs inspectors and other official types, and they will have some serious questions as to why you need something so massive.

IMO, I really can't see what advantages you will gain from this that will be worth the complications that will result. You'd be better off just upgrading your existing shields by several D, which will reduce the expenses, the added weight, the technical headaches, and the legal headaches as well.


If its not flat out listed as prohibited. Being the only 2 canon examples we have of it ARE for imperial military craft, its most likely an X for ANY civilian use. So it being found would put all on the ship of yours in jail.

BUT with that said, i would say you would need both Space transport repair AND capital ship repair (since shields and power come under the base ship) to even install it, somewhere in the very difficult to heroic level of difficulty.
Power is going to be your biggest concern most likely either taking your ship's current power generation and neutering it down to 1/10th output as the shields suck it all up, or needing to get a cap ship power generator.. Which also means you would be needing much larger fuel cells.
_________________
Confucious sayeth, don't wash cat while drunk!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
tetsuoh
Captain
Captain


Joined: 21 Jul 2010
Posts: 505

PostPosted: Tue Jan 22, 2013 4:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Okay - So its Possible by the current rule set - IF your GM allows the x20 ruling.

which makes even the smallest scale up fill a 120ton space - and that doesnt even include the power draw.

you'd probably also need a scaled up reactor to supply it.

*Scratches head* I don't think we got the room chuck.

we'll see what my GM thinks but the comments at least let me know where stuff stands.

A few questions though.
Does the skipray seem to use that much space and power for its shields?
Without the Larger power source does it seem feasible to be able to power shields even with cutting power to everything except emergency systems?
Just how gamebreaking does doing this seem to other GM's out there?

I'm trying to build up a ship that will gain a reputation as being near indestructable. And as such this was one of my thought processes.

Problem is I started with a Ghtroc 720 - they aren't noted for their shields or hull being particularly strong. But thats one of the things I like about the project - its challenge factor.

Now another question - according to the rulebook you can augment shields - and according to Tramp Freighters you can replace them. But is that a double limit factor. Can you only replace shields on a standard 1d shields ship up to 2d+2 ???
If so thats seems a bit - well ridiculous. Espcially in a setting where customization of ships can literally become a sport.

my head hurts...

Edit: oh - IDEA - is there precedence of a light frieghter having more than 4d+2 shields - Other than the skipray and such?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
garhkal
Sovereign Protector
Sovereign Protector


Joined: 17 Jul 2005
Posts: 14034
Location: Reynoldsburg, Columbus, Ohio.

PostPosted: Tue Jan 22, 2013 5:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well lets see..

Luxury 5000 space yacht. 5d hull, 3d shields (no source listed)

Delaya courier ship, 4d hull, 4d shields (with 3d backup)
Vanaya jedi courier ship, 4d hull, 4d shields
Both listed as being from powers of the Jedi (d20 book backwards converted) and the former is also in the tales of the jedi source book.

YZ-900 freighter, 5d hul, 3d shields(source not listed)

YZ-929 armed freighter (new jedi order time frame), 1d hull, 4d shields
(Source is Starwars gamer issue 2 and new jedi order source book, another d20 product)

YZ-775 transport (Gamer magazine issue 2, so unsure if official) 7d hull, 6d shields (WOW THATS POTENT!)

VCX-700 freighter, (new republic time frame) 5d hull 3d shields (starwars gamer issue 2)

VCX-820 escort freighter (NJO time frame, NO SOURCE LISTED), 5d hull 6d shields

That's it for SF scale freighters. ALL the rest are between 1d and 2d shields AT MOST.

So by the back conversion of some D20 ships we get a few with potent shields, and other fan made ones with ludicrous shields (those with no source or made via SW gamer)..
_________________
Confucious sayeth, don't wash cat while drunk!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Fallon Kell
Commodore
Commodore


Joined: 07 Mar 2011
Posts: 1846
Location: Tacoma, WA

PostPosted: Thu Jan 24, 2013 7:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

My Starship Construction System, based off of Grimace and Krapou's work can handle calculations for the prohibitively expensive cost for this type of thing, but unless you're intent on a rock hard shield ship that does little else, I side with crmcniell. Go for a massive starfighter-scale shield.
_________________
Or that excessively long "Noooooooooo" was the Whining Side of the Force leaving him. - Dustflier

Complete Starship Construction System
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
garhkal
Sovereign Protector
Sovereign Protector


Joined: 17 Jul 2005
Posts: 14034
Location: Reynoldsburg, Columbus, Ohio.

PostPosted: Fri Jan 25, 2013 4:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Which caps out at 3d.

Also, i would rather have better hull than shields (since hull is used to soak ion damage).
_________________
Confucious sayeth, don't wash cat while drunk!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
CRMcNeill
Director of Engineering
Director of Engineering


Joined: 05 Apr 2010
Posts: 16178
Location: Redding System, California Sector, on the I-5 Hyperspace Route.

PostPosted: Fri Jan 25, 2013 6:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

garhkal wrote:
Which caps out at 3d.


Darn, the WEG-is-always-right rule strikes again.

Read my signature for WEG's opinion on their own rules. If you want to be able to put more than 3D of shields on your freighter, go right ahead. Just make sure you scale up the price to match.
_________________
"No set of rules can cover every situation. It's expected that you will make up new rules to suit the needs of your game." - The Star Wars Roleplaying Game, 2R&E, pg. 69, WEG, 1996.

The CRMcNeill Stat/Rule Index
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
garhkal
Sovereign Protector
Sovereign Protector


Joined: 17 Jul 2005
Posts: 14034
Location: Reynoldsburg, Columbus, Ohio.

PostPosted: Sat Jan 26, 2013 1:15 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Not saying they were right (as some of the ships i posted above would then be illegal), but saying that BY the book they cap at 3d.
So first off you would need to convince your DM (GM) to house rule that shields can be purchased/made/tweeked to go ABOVE 3d, THEN you need to (in game) research it and then do the purchases etc...
_________________
Confucious sayeth, don't wash cat while drunk!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
tetsuoh
Captain
Captain


Joined: 21 Jul 2010
Posts: 505

PostPosted: Sat Jan 26, 2013 4:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thats normally what we do.

My GM doesn't actually have a problem with it - however you see thats because all things have a natural cap in our game. Installing this will probably be beyond my characters ability - hes simply not that technically minded yet.

you see for us going for a 1d to 3d is more difficult in itself - 6 pips of difference is monumental - increasing it further is usually one more difficulty per pip and we go beyond heroic even, at +10 per usually :S
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
garhkal
Sovereign Protector
Sovereign Protector


Joined: 17 Jul 2005
Posts: 14034
Location: Reynoldsburg, Columbus, Ohio.

PostPosted: Sat Jan 26, 2013 5:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Remember you can combine actions for installing stuff.
_________________
Confucious sayeth, don't wash cat while drunk!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    The Rancor Pit Forum Index -> Ships, Vehicles, Equipment, and Tech All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group


v2.0