The Rancor Pit Forum Index
Welcome to The Rancor Pit forums!

The Rancor Pit Forum Index
FAQ   ::   Search   ::   Memberlist   ::   Usergroups   ::   Register   ::   Profile   ::   Log in to check your private messages   ::   Log in

Starkiller Base
Post new topic   Reply to topic    The Rancor Pit Forum Index -> Planets, Locations, Eras, and Settings -> Starkiller Base Goto page Previous  1, 2
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
CRMcNeill
Grand Moff
Grand Moff


Joined: 05 Apr 2010
Posts: 9882
Location: Redding System, California Sector, on the I-5 Hyperspace Route.

PostPosted: Sun Sep 10, 2017 7:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

garhkal wrote:
Maybe it was made to do something else.

What, exactly?
_________________
"No set of rules can cover every situation. It's expected that you will make up new rules to suit the needs of your game." - The Star Wars Roleplaying Game, 2R&E, pg. 69, WEG, 1996.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Whill
Moderator


Joined: 15 Apr 2008
Posts: 3619
Location: Columbus, OHIO, USA, Earth, Solar System, Milky Way, The Whills Universe

PostPosted: Sun Sep 10, 2017 11:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Wajeb Deb Kaadeb wrote:
Whill wrote:
5. Starkiller Base (660 km diameter sphere) Hyperlight weapon that can destroy entire star systems from across the galaxy through hyperspace at FTL speeds!
4. Death Star II (200 km diameter sphere) Superlaser that can at least destroy terrestrial planets (and target capital ships).
3. Death Star I (160 km diameter sphere) Superlaser that can destroy terrestrial planets within the same system.
2. The Supremacy (60 km wingspan non-sphere capital ship)
1. The Executor (19 km long non-sphere capital ship)

...You are saying that making a 2 means you can also make a 5. You are basically saying 2 through 5 are all the same.

...The Starkiller is an exponentially giant leap above the Death Star II, and the Supremacy is way below that. The ancient weapon theory for Starkiller is by no means "blown out of the water".

No, I just wasn't convinced by your argument.
garhkal wrote:
IMO its easier to modify a planet that would be to build Snorks flag ship..

My only argument was that the ancient weapon theory is not 'blown out of the water'. It is presently still on the table. I can better appreciate sentiments of 'my gut tells me the First Order constructed the Starkiller', but 'the ancient weapon is blown out of the water'? I feel "Blown out of the water" is quite extreme phrase for fanboy speculation.

I find the arguments that 'if you can build a 2 you can build anything' and '5 is easier to build than 2' to not be based on any sort of logic whatsoever (not even space opera nerd logic), so there's nothing further for me to say to that. Good day to you, sirs.

CRMcNeill wrote:
I still have serious issues with Starkiller Base (particularly the real-time viewing of the beam from across the galaxy with no relativistic delay), but the idea of it being an ancient device the First Order just happened across makes more sense than anything else I've heard. The EU already has at least one ancient device that can affect the galaxy on a massive scale (Centerpoint Station), so a second device that the neo-Imperialists moved in on and used for their own purposes is, IMO, more plausible than that they built it themselves.

Starting in 1977, Star Wars films have been filled with all sorts of outrageous technologies, but an FTL super weapon capable of remotely destroying all the planets of a distant solar system and it being viewable in realspace all over the galaxy admittedly strains even my sense of verisimilitude for the SWU. I just choose to swallow the red pill because TFA is such an entertaining movie and love letter to the classic SW trilogy, despite it being a thinly disguised reprise of ANH, my favorite movie for 40 years strong now. RotJ gets more of a pass for unoriginality than TFA does because RotJ is only the second time there was a superweapon (now bigger and more powerful), the first DS was actually taken from the third part when Lucas first expanded his original story into a trilogy, and it was the conclusion of the trilogy (and at the time perhaps Star Wars saga).

I had no doubt that there would be a further escalation of scale in this new trilogy, but I was quite surprised that they put the super-duper Death Star in the first film. Are they going to continue the scale escalation and have another superweapon to be even bigger and badder than the Starkiller? Or be more original for these sequels? Despite loving the reprise I do hope the sequels are more original. I don't let these questions effect my enjoyment of TFA, and at this point I have to remain confident they won't turn Star Wars into a super-weapon-of-the-month club too soon. At least the Starkiller is still more plausible than the Sun Crusher!

Since there is no end in sight for Disney Star Wars, there probably will someday be a future trilogy where there are intergalactic wars with weapons that can destroy entire regions of galaxies, from other galaxies, visible all over the universe in real time!

CRMcNeill wrote:
garhkal wrote:
Maybe it was made to do something else.

What, exactly?

It's hard to imagine that technology being used for anything else, with such a specific purpose of destroying star systems through hyperspace from across the galaxy.
_________________
-
"Would you trade that necklace for a glimpse into your future? ...What do you know of kyber crystals?"
"The Force moves darkly near a creature that’s about to kill... I'm gonna follow Jyn. Her path is clear."

"Tell that to Kanjiklub."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Zarn
Commander
Commander


Joined: 17 Jun 2014
Posts: 493
Location: Norway

PostPosted: Mon Sep 11, 2017 10:41 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

If we're speculating about non-explody applications of Starkiller Base, provided it is an old relic ... I'm thinking a hypergate / infinity gate, but which can pick one spacetime coordinate and generate a portal there of quite a large size and duration without any (other) infrastructure locally.

I'm thinking more infinity gate than hypergate, mostly because the infinity gates were explicitly noted to have a weapon-like use through infinity waves - but that might just be a bias on my part, as I dislike blaming the Gree for all sorts of ancient relics of great power.

Anyhow, continuing on the infinity gates - there's a pocket dimension that contains the central control station for the gates, and putting something in there (or generating the pocket dimension) is likely to have required some doing - something on the scale of Starkiller Base.

If I were to suggest some race as the original builders of Starkiller Base, I would likely suggest whomever made the Tho Yor.

http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Hypergate

http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Infinity_Gate
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
garhkal
Grand Moff
Grand Moff


Joined: 17 Jul 2005
Posts: 11036
Location: Reynoldsburg, Columbus, ohio.

PostPosted: Mon Sep 11, 2017 7:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

CRMcNeill wrote:
garhkal wrote:
Maybe it was made to do something else.

What, exactly?


Maybe it was made to slowly suck energy from stars that are close to going nova, to prevent them from doing so..?

Zarn wrote:
If we're speculating about non-explody applications of Starkiller Base, provided it is an old relic ... I'm thinking a hypergate / infinity gate, but which can pick one spacetime coordinate and generate a portal there of quite a large size and duration without any (other) infrastructure locally.

I'm thinking more infinity gate than hypergate, mostly because the infinity gates were explicitly noted to have a weapon-like use through infinity waves - but that might just be a bias on my part, as I dislike blaming the Gree for all sorts of ancient relics of great power.

Anyhow, continuing on the infinity gates - there's a pocket dimension that contains the central control station for the gates, and putting something in there (or generating the pocket dimension) is likely to have required some doing - something on the scale of Starkiller Base.

If I were to suggest some race as the original builders of Starkiller Base, I would likely suggest whomever made the Tho Yor.

http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Hypergate

http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Infinity_Gate


Maybe it was built as a companion facility to centerpoint station, since it needs lots of gravity/repulsor activity to work, the planet, was used to 'absorb gravity' from suns and funnel it TO centerpoint?
_________________
It's Not who you kill, but how they die!
You cannot dodge it if you do not know it is coming, and you cannot hit it if you do not know its there.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Falconer
Lieutenant Commander
Lieutenant Commander


Joined: 08 Dec 2014
Posts: 146

PostPosted: Tue Sep 12, 2017 5:51 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

There’s a fan theory which I presume is untrue but which I think would be really siick: that the real name of the planet is Jedha, which, after the events of R1, got hauled out somewhere, and work began on making it the Star Killer. Thus it fits it into a larger narrative, making the Death Stars mere prototypes instead of the Star Killer seeming an afterthought. Imagine using it in a campaign (prior to TFA). There’s an obscure but supremely dangerous Imperial Remnant base in the Unknown Regions, but you might want to go there if you need some kyber crystals, or some old texts or artifacts from the ruins of the Temple of the Whills.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
RyanDarkstar
Lieutenant
Lieutenant


Joined: 05 Dec 2014
Posts: 76
Location: Chambersburg, PA, USA, Earth

PostPosted: Tue Sep 12, 2017 3:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Falconer wrote:
There’s a fan theory which I presume is untrue but which I think would be really sick: that the real name of the planet is Jedha, which, after the events of R1, got hauled out somewhere, and work began on making it the Star Killer...


I posted something here about Ilum possibly being Starkiller Base, per Star Wars Explained.
_________________
Currently playing AD&D 5E, The Old Republic, Neverwinter and Star Trek Online.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Wajeb Deb Kaadeb
Line Captain
Line Captain


Joined: 07 Apr 2017
Posts: 785

PostPosted: Wed Sep 13, 2017 12:21 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Falconer wrote:
There’s a fan theory which I presume is untrue but which I think would be really siick: that the real name of the planet is Jedha, which, after the events of R1, got hauled out somewhere, and work began on making it the Star Killer.


I'm not sure I like that. It seems to fall into George's small universe problem.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    The Rancor Pit Forum Index -> Planets, Locations, Eras, and Settings All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2
Page 2 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group


v2.0